Target Corporation, as well as a mechanical door manufacturer, have agreed to pay $7 million to an elderly woman injured when an automatic door at the Target store malfunctioned and knocked her down causing a brain injury.

According to court documents, as Plaintiff , Claire Putman as was entering the Target store,  the door malfunctioned and closed before she had maneuvered through the entry. Putman, a petite, elderly woman, hit her head when she fell to the ground.  Then, her head was hit a 2nd time by the door when it continued to open and close.

Putman was rushed to the Hospital and diagnosed with a subdural hematoma.   As a result, she has suffered brain damage that has left her with some cognitive deficits and must live in a nursing home.

If you have suffered a personal injury, please give The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: March 27, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.