Debt collection agency, Allied Interstate Inc., has agreed to a $1.75 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), following allegations that Allied Interstate violated the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) by trying to collect debts from people who did not owe the debts.

The FTC also alleged that Allied Interstate made a practice of speaking to neighbors, co-workers and family members about consumers’ debts, even though the debt was not owed by the consumers. On a side note, even if they consumer had owed the debt, the debt collectors may not discuss the debts with 3rd parties (family, friends, neighbors, co-workers).  The FTC said Allied deceived consumers by threatening legal action it didn’t intend to take. Both practices are illegal, according to the FDCPA.

FTC officials said the action against Allied reflects a strategic shift in enforcement. A few years ago, the agency began to focus on larger debt collectors engaged in illegal practices. By cracking down on the bigger debt collectors, the agency hopes to send a message to smaller debt collectors who engage in the same behavior.

Last year, the FTC received 88,190 complaints about third-party debt collectors, up from 78,925 a year earlier. Approximately,  half of the complaints involved allegations that collectors harassed people by calling repeatedly, the FTC said in an annual report to Congress.

One such complaints stems from the case of  Wallace Milow  vs Allied, in this case Milow alleges that  Allied collectors called him repeatedly demanding he pay his son’s $10,000 credit card debt. When Milow refused, Allied allegedly threatened to have his son arrested with bail set at $12,000.

Milow alleged that Allied kept calling him even after he told the firm that he could not pay his son’s debt and asked Allied to stop contacting him.

If you are being harassed by debt collectors in violation of the FDCPA, you may be entitled to compensation.  Please call California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: May 1, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.