Aggressive Debt Collectors know that having your co-workers or employer find out that you are  being perused by debt collectors, can be very embarrassing and that you might be inclined to take any means necessary to get them paid faster.

It is legal for a debt collector to contact your employer if they have a judgment against you in order to set up a garnishment. That is all they can do, however. This is not an opportunity for the collector to discuss your matter in great detail. Simply, they need to find out where to send the garnishment notice.

A collector can also contact any 3rd party, which may include an employer. But, only in order to seek your location information, and in doing so, must specifically state just that – that they are looking for location information – and nothing more. Furthermore, they can only contact that third-party one time. So if a collector is contacting an employer, and that collector does not have a judgment against you, and that collector does not just ask for where you are located, then that collector may be in violation of the  Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, FDCPA.

This being said, a collector’s ability to contact your employer is extremely limited. Many of the contacts do violate the FDCPA. If you are dealing with a harassing collector who is contacting your employer, contact my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898

Published: December 11, 2012

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.