A creditor is never allowed to harass you and the law provides many remedies for consumers who are being harassed by rogue debt collectors. If you are in bankruptcy, the laws governing creditor communication are even tougher.

It is a violation of the bankruptcy “automatic stay” for creditors to contact a person in bankruptcy about paying most debts incurred prior to the bankruptcy filing.  If the debt collector has received notice of  your bankruptcy filing and continues their collection efforts, the bankruptcy code provides monetary compensation as a remedy to you for being harassed.

Although the bankruptcy court cannot stop the debt  collector from continued collection attempts, the court can award monetary damages to the individual in bankruptcy being contacted.  If you are experiencing this problem contact The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman at (877) 449-8898.

Published: November 5, 2012

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.