Allied Interstate,  one of the country’s largest debt collection agencies paid $1.75 million for allegedly making repeated phone calls to collect debts from the wrong person or to collect the wrong amount from debtors.

According to the FTC,  Allied demanded payment from people even after they were told by the consumer they did not owe the debt.  Allied reportedly did nothing to  verify the accuracy of the disputed information. The company also allegedly made  harassing phone calls to consumers, using abusive language or calling several times a day for weeks or months. Additionally, Allied made repeated calls to 3rd parties, revealing details of the debts.  All of these actions are in direct violation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

In addition to the monetary penalty, the proposed consent decree requires Allied to take specific steps whenever a consumer disputes that he or she owes the debt or the amount of the debt.

If you have been harassed by a debt collector in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please call Los Angeles Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman a call at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: March 28, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.