The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an employment discrimination lawsuit involving clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch’s decision not to hire a teenage girl as a sales associate because she wore a headscarf for religious reasons. The woman says she was the victim of hiring discrimination, but Abercrombie says the headscarf would have conflicted with its “Look Policy.”

Abercrombie’s “Look Policy” applies to its “models,” the company’s term for its sales associates. Models wear Abercrombie’s apparel to help advertise it to shoppers. At the time the plaintiff applied for a job, the Look Policy prohibited models from wearing headscarves, even as a religious practice.

The plaintiff, now in her 20s, is a Muslim. When she applied to become a model at an Abercrombie store, an assistant manager considered her a good candidate for the job. But when she checked with the store’s manager about whether they could accommodate the plaintiff’s headscarf, the manager refused.

The plaintiff complained to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which sued Abercrombie on her behalf. Federal anti-employment discrimination law forbids employers from not hiring job applicants due to their religion. An exception exists for employers if they can show that they cannot accommodate the applicant’s religious practices.

So, the question in this case is whether an Abercrombie model would be able to do his or her job while wearing a religious garment on his or her head. Abercrombie has amended its Look Policy since the incident in question, but is defending its right to keep its models from “wearing inconsistent clothing.”

Americans should be able to pursue any job they want, regardless of their religious beliefs.

Published: December 18, 2014

Updated: December 18, 2014


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

Pregnancy Discrimination in Los Angeles: California’s Strong Protections for Expecting Workers

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Pregnancy discrimination remains prevalent in Los Angeles workplaces despite California’s comprehensive protections for expecting workers. Understanding these rights helps ...

Forced Retirement: When Is It Age Discrimination?

Age discrimination in the workplace is a serious and widespread issue, particularly when it comes to forced retirement. While some companies implement mandatory retirement ...

EEOC Pauses LGBTQ+ Discrimination Investigations, California’s CRD Continues

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency responsible for investigating workplace discrimination claims, has reportedly halted its investigations into cases related to ...