California has laws imposing penalties on businesses that try to deceive consumers or other companies through unfair practices such as false claims regarding products or services. False advertising laws are designed to protect the consumers, such as yourself.

Below are descriptions of the these laws.

  • Any type of deceptive advertising that causes a loss of revenue for any competitor is prohibited
  • Businesses deceiving consumers by advertising a product, property, or service in a false or deceptive manner is also prohibited

While, it is common for advertisers and competitors in the same industry to all claim to be able to provide “the best” services or products, simply saying they are “the best” is not prohibited.  As statements like “best product” are considered to be a personal opinion,  not a fact, so there are stipulations to the law that do allow for this type of competitive advertising.

However, when an advertisement goes a step beyond being competitive and is designed to deceive consumers into purchasing a service or product that is not what is promised, then it  becomes a problem. In such instances, legal actions may be brought by an injured consumers and also, in some cases, by business competitors to recover lost revenue or payment.

An example of when advertising is considered deceptive rather than just competitive is the class action lawsuit presently being filed against Kia and Hyundai for false inflating mileage.  With the high cost of gas many consumers are making their car buying decisions based on mpg.  Not only does it hurt the consumer when they decide to buy a Hyundai over a competitor because they believe they will get better gas savings, but it also hurts the competitor that has posted it’s correct mpg which may show a less desirable mpg than the inflated mpg that Hyundai deceptively posted.

If you have been a victim of false advertising at the hands of Kia, Hyundai or another auto maker please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.

 

Published: November 28, 2012

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.