I hope you kept your gift receipt!   A class action lawsuit has been filed against Macy’s Inc., alleging that they fraudulently advertised and sold gold-plated jewelry as “Fine Gold” in violation of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) standards.

The lawsuit was brought by plaintiff Natalya Barsukov, who on April 18, 2010,  purchased a pair of earrings from Macy’s that were labeled “Fine Gold.”  She was told the earrings were regularly priced at $360.00 but were currently priced at $129.09 due to a “pre-sale.”  Unfortunately, Natalya’s earrings began to exhibit signs of tarnishing and discoloration,  turning  from gold color to gray.   After taking the earings to an independent jeweler, she learned the earrings were not “Fine Gold”  at all,  but sterling silver covered with a microlayer of gold.

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules, the use of the word “Gold” or any abbreviation is prohibited to describe all or part of any product not composed completely of gold or a gold alloy.  The word “Gold” may be used to describe gold-plated items  if the description  “adequately identifies that the item is only surfaced-plated with gold”.

False advertising can be costly and frustrating, as well as embarrassing if you have given the item as a gift to a loved one thinking that you are giving them “fine gold”.

If you are the victim of false advertising please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898.

Published: December 29, 2012

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.