On October 17, 2012, in the case Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., the Court ruled that “robocalls” made by Best Buy to remind consumers to use their Best Buy “Reward Zone” points are telemarketing calls and are indeed subject to the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Plaintiff Michael Chesbro bought a computer from Best Buy and claims he did not sign up for the Reward Zone program, but nonetheless, Best Buy made autodialed calls to his phone with pre-recorded messages about the Reward Zone program, including reminders to use his points before they expired, and to “inform” him about other changes in the program.  Best Buy continued to make robocalls to Mr. Chesbro  after he told Best Buy to stop calling him.

Best Buy argued that the auto-dialed calls to Mr. Chesbro and thousands of other consumers nationwide were “informational” calls and were not intended to entice consumers to shop at Best Buy.  The trial court agreed and dismissed Mr. Chesbro’s case.  However, Chesbro appealed, and the Ninth Circuit Court agreed with his position, stating “there was no other use for the Reward Zone points” than redeeming them with future Best Buy purchases,” the calls were telemarketing calls, not “informational” calls.

Read the Ninth Circuit’s Ruling  (Chesbro v. Best Buy Stores, L.P., 11-35784, 2012 WL 6700555 (9th Cir. Dec. 27, 2012)

If you are receiving unsolicited calls in violation of the TCPA you may be entitled to compensation.  If you are a California resident please give my office, The Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman a call at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: January 22, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.