Preliminarily approval of  a $9.9 million class action lawsuit settlement with Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc. has been made  following allegations that they sent unsolicited text messages to approximately 216,000 consumers. The case titled Robles v. Lucky Brand Dungarees, Inc., accuses the company of sending unsolicited text messages to cellphones offering $25 off Lucky jeans or offering store location services to consumers in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

As part of the settlement consumers that received the Lucky Brand text spam between August 24 and September 15, 2008 will receive up to $100 under the class action settlement.

If you have received unsolicited spam text messages from a company located in the U.S.  you may be entitled to compensation.  Please give my office, The Law Office of Todd M. Friedman a call today at (877) 449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: January 9, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.