Many desperate debt collectors threaten debtors with immediate wage or bank account garnishment as a tactic to intimidate them into payment.  However, it is important to know that debt collectors who threaten to garnish a consumer’s wages, without being entitled to do so are in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).  Until a creditor has obtained a judgment against a debtor, the collection agency should not be making threats of garnishment.

In regards to loans issued by or guaranteed by a federal agency, the owner of the educational loan can proceed through an administrative system. The Department of Education obtains Administrative Wage Garnishments (AWG) as a last resort tool.

The Department of Education must send the borrower a notice thirty days prior to ordering wage garnishment. The notice must explain the Department of Education’s intention to garnish; the nature and amount of the debt; that the borrower has the opportunity to inspect and copy records relating to the debt; that the borrower may object to the garnishment to collect the debt; and describe garnishment by voluntary repayment.  The notice must also inform the borrower that the borrower may request a hearing to present evidence and request a ruling on any objection by the borrower to the existence, amount, or enforceability of the debt.

Borrowers who receive a notice of the Department of Education’s intent to garnish wages, still have the opportunity to enter into a written repayment agreement with the Department.

Consumers also have the opportunity to have a hearing to present that garnishment of their disposable income would produce and extreme financial hardship.

The consumer has the right to have the garnishment action withheld by filing a timely request for a hearing, until the hearing is completed and a decision issued.

Employers are prohibited from discharging debtors, refusing to employ them, or subjecting them to disciplinary action due to the garnishment.  Debtors also have the right to ask the Department of Education to provide the employer no more information than is necessary for the employer to comply with the withholding order.

If a debt collection agency is harassing you in an attempt to collect a student loan, you are welcome to contact California Consumer Protection Attorney, Todd M. Friedman at 877-449-8898 for a free consultation.

Published: May 15, 2013

Updated: March 28, 2025


This is attorney advertising. These posts are written on behalf of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C. and are intended solely as informational content. These blogs in no way provide specific or actionable legal advice, nor does your use of or engagement with this site establish any attorney-client relationship. Please read the disclaimer


More Insights from the TMF Blog

FDCPA Credit Reporting Errors

Credit Reporting Errors: How to Fix Your Credit Report and Sue for Damages

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Credit report errors affect millions of Americans, leading to denied loans, higher interest rates, and employment rejections. Understanding your ...

Unfair Business Practices: California’s UCL and Consumer Protection Remedies

Table of Contents Key Takeaways Four-year statute of limitations applies to most UCL claimsCalifornia’s Unfair Competition Law provides consumers with powerful tools to combat ...
a group of people in a courtroom looking at a screen

Delta’s Pricing Practices: Building the Case for Legal Action

Dynamic pricing algorithms used by Delta Air Lines may violate consumer protection laws, potentially leading to class-action lawsuits. Previous legal precedents set by actions against other companies over algorithmic bias and discriminatory practices could help challenge these systems. Various attributes like zip code, device type, or browsing history that impact pricing could lead to violation of consumer protection and civil rights protections. Investigations by multiple agencies signal a move towards a stronger stance against such practices.